Back
[01:56:43] <anonnumberanon> wow rue_bed rue_house can you actually do main(); in a program and it will run? Recursively ?
[01:58:42] <DagoRed> anonnumberanon: answer is yes. Main is a function that can have a return... so why not?
[02:01:30] <anonnumberanon> that's funny
[02:01:43] <anonnumberanon> it's rare to see something like this
[02:01:51] <anonnumberanon> kind of looks like a hack
[02:01:56] <DagoRed> .g destroy all software what is wat
[02:01:57] <makepi> DagoRed:
https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat
[02:02:04] <DagoRed> anonnumberanon: watch that.
[02:02:20] * DagoRed pets the bot
[02:06:53] <anonnumberanon> Hah
[02:19:28] <anonnumberanon> I'm still mesmerized at the amount of stuff there is to play with in an AVR.
[02:47:47] <rue_bed> anonnumberanon, you seriously just look at that now!?
[02:49:32] <rue_bed> 13 days ago dude
[02:50:10] * anonnumberanon never forget
[02:50:46] <anonnumberanon> No I'm joking in fact I don't administer my machines and my connections to the IRC very well.
[02:51:00] <anonnumberanon> Thus I don't know when who posts what.
[09:35:44] <rue_house> anonnumberanon, so your scrolling back 13 days?
[09:53:23] <veverak> hmm
[09:53:34] <veverak> is there nice word for mechanical units?
[09:53:44] <veverak> like 'gimbal' 'arm'
[09:53:58] <veverak> been thinking if there is nice single-wort term
[11:17:07] <deshipu> whaddayacallit
[11:18:58] <deshipu> thingamajig
[15:43:15] <robogl47> anyone here?
[15:46:39] <robopal> you
[16:03:32] <robopal> didn't like that
[16:58:57] <anonnumberanon> rue_house, guess the last log i had on my laptop was 13 days old
[16:59:56] <anonnumberanon> anyway, gonna try to bring down jitter to close to 1us today
[17:00:17] <anonnumberanon> I got the knowledge, just need to do the math and DA CODING
[17:00:24] <anonnumberanon> give me some CODINE
[17:00:58] <joga> wish I had some!
[17:01:32] <anonnumberanon> Expresso will do for now.
[17:01:35] <joga> ..actually I do, it's in over-the-counter cough medicine..
[17:04:48] <anonnumberanon> I'm furious that my computer calculator only is precise to 10^9
[17:05:15] <anonnumberanon> I get 62 instead of 62.5 ns for a clock period.
[17:05:25] <anonnumberanon> Have to use Google's calculator instead.
[17:06:38] <anonnumberanon> Nvm using the "engineering setting I get 62.5*10^9
[17:06:45] <anonnumberanon> we're in buusiness
[17:39:31] <anonnumberanon> what timer does UART use on avr?
[21:46:16] <anonnumberanon> 20 nanosecond jitter on one PWM
[21:46:19] <anonnumberanon> :)
[21:47:46] <anonnumberanon> lol no actually more like about 130 ns lol
[23:42:08] <rue_house> man what an evening
[23:42:53] <rue_house> anonnumberanon, uart dosn't use a timer
[23:43:53] <anonnumberanon> yee