#linuxcnc-devel Logs

Aug 19 2022

03:58 PM linuxcnc-build: build #2030 of 4041.deb-buster-rtpreempt-amd64 is complete: Failure [4failed shell_3 shell_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/4041.deb-buster-rtpreempt-amd64/builds/2030 blamelist: Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>
04:42 PM -!- #linuxcnc-devel mode set to +v by ChanServ
04:45 PM -!- #linuxcnc-devel mode set to +v by ChanServ
04:46 PM Tom_itx is now known as Tom_L
04:55 PM -!- #linuxcnc-devel mode set to +v by ChanServ
05:05 PM linuxcnc-build: build #1923 of 4042.deb-buster-rtpreempt-rpi4 is complete: Failure [4failed shell_3 shell_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/4042.deb-buster-rtpreempt-rpi4/builds/1923 blamelist: Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>
07:46 PM -!- #linuxcnc-devel mode set to +v by ChanServ
07:46 PM -!- #linuxcnc-devel mode set to +v by ChanServ
08:44 PM jepler[m]1: pere: any other low hanging fruit for me to review?
09:58 PM -!- #linuxcnc-devel mode set to +v by ChanServ
10:21 PM pere: jepler[m]1: <URL: https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pull/1278 > came to mind, but I see you already looked at it. :)
10:56 PM pere: jepler[m]1: regarding #1278, I must admit that adding -fno-* flags to hide real issues (like using deprecated methods in classicladder) rub me the wrong way. why do you believe it is better to hide the warnings?
11:15 PM pere: jepler[m]1: <URL: https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pull/1657 > seem like a better way to get rid of classicladder deprication warnings. :)