#linuxcnc-devel | Logs for 2016-06-08

Back
[10:49:23] -linuxcnc-github:#linuxcnc-devel- [13linuxcnc] 15SebKuzminsky closed issue #64: tkemc button help-version fails 02https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/issues/64
[11:23:59] <cradek> the users list was too quiet so someone started talking about donald f. trump
[11:24:32] <seb_kuzminsky> how about that weather?
[11:25:38] <cradek> I was just reading about a wifi-connected battery-operated egg tray
[11:26:00] <seb_kuzminsky> the internet of eggs is coming!
[12:32:29] <CaptHindsight> I was surprised that Los Alamos National Laboratory had not heard of Linuxcnc
[12:44:22] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Sebastian Kuzminsky 052.6 075eb10 06linuxcnc 10docs/src/drivers/shuttlexpress.txt shuttlexpress: word-wrap the asciidocs * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=075eb10
[12:44:22] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Sebastian Kuzminsky 052.6 6e0f215 06linuxcnc 10docs/src/drivers/shuttlexpress.txt shuttlexpress: asciidoc markup fixes * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=6e0f215
[12:44:22] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Sebastian Kuzminsky 052.6 7c21c70 06linuxcnc 10docs/man/man1/shuttlexpress.1 10docs/src/drivers/shuttlexpress.txt shuttlexpress: clean up the manpage & asciidocs * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=7c21c70
[12:48:00] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Sebastian Kuzminsky 052.7 01e4bb6 06linuxcnc 10docs/src/drivers/shuttlexpress.txt Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/2.6' into 2.7 * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=01e4bb6
[12:50:49] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Sebastian Kuzminsky 05master f99bdad 06linuxcnc 10src/emc/rs274ngc/rs274ngc_pre.cc 10src/emc/task/emctaskmain.cc 10src/emc/usr_intf/axis/extensions/emcmodule.cc Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/2.7' * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=f99bdad
[12:54:27] <seb_kuzminsky> cradek: i was evangelizing to you about putting your dot-files in git a few weeks ago...
[12:54:47] <seb_kuzminsky> i just got a merge conflict in my .gitconfig, which struck me as funny
[12:54:48] <cradek> yes I recall
[12:54:52] <cradek> ha
[12:55:02] <seb_kuzminsky> git still ran fine, but it complained about the merge conflict markers, until i resolved it :-)
[12:55:11] <cradek> it's a rabbit hole
[13:14:49] <jepler> oh how bizarre
[13:15:10] <jepler> a non-root, failing chown(1) invocation can remove extended attributes, such as capabilities from a non-owned file
[13:15:14] <jepler> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770492
[13:16:07] <cradek> very old ext3 filesystem (originally created as ext2)
[13:16:11] <cradek> wow
[13:16:26] <jepler> affects the first system I tested it on, in the cloud(tm) but I assume it's got a modern filesystem type
[13:16:45] <jepler> /dev/vda1 / ext4 rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,data=ordered 0 0
[13:20:57] <jepler> as you might guess from the way the discussion petered out, it still affects kernel 4.4
[14:01:22] <PCW> I resent that terminology
[14:06:02] <skunkworks_> heh
[14:06:40] <jepler> :-P
[14:06:52] <jepler> but "sammed out" doesn't have the same ring toit
[14:10:48] <linuxcnc-build_> build #368 of 4017.5.deb-wheezy-armhf is complete: Failure [4failed shell_3] Build details are at http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/4017.5.deb-wheezy-armhf/builds/368 blamelist: Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>
[14:11:13] <cradek> the build is sammed out
[14:16:01] <skunkworks_> hmm. I not liking the direction this is taking...
[14:24:08] <jepler> skunkworks_: man up and peter it out. you don't want to get a reputation for samming.
[14:33:10] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03John Morris 05remap-io-lcnc 2dcfc8a 06linuxcnc 10(7 files) `nested-remaps-oword` test: Do what `README` says * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=2dcfc8a
[14:33:10] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03John Morris 05remap-io-lcnc 0acc080 06linuxcnc 10(7 files) Unit test demonstrating a remap bug * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=0acc080
[14:33:10] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03John Morris 05remap-io-lcnc 63fd10e 06linuxcnc 10src/emc/rs274ngc/rs274ngc_pre.cc Fix incorrect `_setup.sequence_number` after remaps * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=63fd10e
[14:33:12] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03John Morris 05remap-io-lcnc 2b8b98c 06linuxcnc 10(22 files in 2 dirs) Enable remap of M62-M68 * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=2b8b98c
[14:33:54] <KGB-linuxcnc> 05remap-io-lcnc 2b8b98c 06linuxcnc 04. branch deleted * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=2b8b98c
[14:34:41] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03John Morris 05zultron/remap-io-lcnc 2dcfc8a 06linuxcnc 10(7 files) `nested-remaps-oword` test: Do what `README` says * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=2dcfc8a
[14:34:41] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03John Morris 05zultron/remap-io-lcnc 0acc080 06linuxcnc 10(7 files) Unit test demonstrating a remap bug * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=0acc080
[14:34:41] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03John Morris 05zultron/remap-io-lcnc 63fd10e 06linuxcnc 10src/emc/rs274ngc/rs274ngc_pre.cc Fix incorrect `_setup.sequence_number` after remaps * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=63fd10e
[14:34:43] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03John Morris 05zultron/remap-io-lcnc 2b8b98c 06linuxcnc 10(22 files in 2 dirs) Enable remap of M62-M68 * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=2b8b98c
[14:42:26] <skunkworks_> Ooooh
[14:54:08] <cradek> gosh
[14:54:16] <cradek> I wonder how many zultron branches are waiting on us to merge
[14:54:57] * cradek swoons
[14:55:00] <cradek> he always writes a test
[15:41:17] <seb_kuzminsky> adding a test along with your change is sure a good confidence builder
[15:55:08] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03John Morris 05zultron/remap-io-lcnc 4fb38da 06linuxcnc 10(22 files in 2 dirs) Enable remap of M62-M68 * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=4fb38da
[16:04:58] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03John Morris 05zultron/remap-io-lcnc 2947900 06linuxcnc 10(22 files in 2 dirs) Enable remap of M62-M68 * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=2947900
[16:22:29] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03John Morris 05zultron/remap-io-lcnc 557c961 06linuxcnc 10(22 files in 2 dirs) Enable remap of M62-M68 * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=557c961
[16:50:42] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Sebastian Kuzminsky 05seb/2.6/task-cleanups 4a07c37 06linuxcnc 10src/rtapi/sim_common.h rtapi (sim): flush stdout/stderr after rtapi_print() * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=4a07c37
[16:50:42] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Sebastian Kuzminsky 05seb/2.6/task-cleanups fd6e951 06linuxcnc 10src/emc/task/emctaskmain.cc Task: fixup indentation * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=fd6e951
[16:50:42] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Sebastian Kuzminsky 05seb/2.6/task-cleanups 72dd0e6 06linuxcnc 10src/emc/task/iotaskintf.cc 10src/emc/task/taskclass.cc Task: don't call emcAbortCleanup() in emcIoAbort() * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=72dd0e6
[16:50:45] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Sebastian Kuzminsky 05seb/2.6/task-cleanups b996c77 06linuxcnc 10src/emc/task/emctaskmain.cc Task: don't call emcTaskPlanInit() again * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=b996c77
[16:50:49] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Sebastian Kuzminsky 05seb/2.6/task-cleanups 48daf71 06linuxcnc 10src/emc/task/emctask.cc 10tests/motion-logger/basic/expected.builtin-startup 10tests/motion-logger/mountaindew/expected.motion-logger Task: only turn off the spindle once, when entering Estop * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=48daf71
[16:50:54] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Sebastian Kuzminsky 05seb/2.6/task-cleanups eff7f58 06linuxcnc 10src/emc/rs274ngc/interp_convert.cc Interp: consistently set feed rate to 0 on M2/M30 * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=eff7f58
[16:58:23] -linuxcnc-github:#linuxcnc-devel- [13linuxcnc] 15SebKuzminsky opened pull request #65: Seb/2.6/task cleanups (062.6...06seb/2.6/task-cleanups) 02https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pull/65
[17:01:19] <linuxcnc-build_> build #2381 of 1405.rip-wheezy-armhf is complete: Failure [4failed compile] Build details are at http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/1405.rip-wheezy-armhf/builds/2381 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>, Moses McKnight <moses@texband.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[17:20:17] <linuxcnc-build_> build #4200 of 0000.checkin is complete: Failure [4failed] Build details are at http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/0000.checkin/builds/4200 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>, Moses McKnight <moses@texband.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[17:20:32] <linuxcnc-build_> build #4201 of 0000.checkin is complete: Failure [4failed fetch branch to local git repo] Build details are at http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/0000.checkin/builds/4201 blamelist: John Morris <john@zultron.com>
[20:14:24] <skunkworks> http://electronicsam.com/images/matsuura/20160608_185000.jpg
[20:14:32] <skunkworks> re-assembly
[20:21:06] <andypugh> skunkworks: I may have a more robust encoder mount than you :-)
[20:21:42] <andypugh> (I reckon you are my only competition for that keenly-contested award)
[20:21:48] <skunkworks> heh
[20:22:18] <andypugh> 3 x 3/8” bolts to hold a 1.25” diameter resolver?
[20:22:59] <skunkworks> Nice! Pictures?
[20:23:44] <andypugh> https://picasaweb.google.com/108164504656404380542/Holbrook#6293941691898118434
[20:24:33] <skunkworks> did you hob the timing pullys too?
[20:25:16] <andypugh> It’s the lower pink casting. It used to hold the back-gears, so had real work to do. But even then most lathe manufacturers didnt hang their back-gears on 1.25” shafts with needle roller bearings.
[20:26:05] <andypugh> skunkworks: No, I bought them I don’t have a 3mm pitch XL hob, and they were only £10 each
[20:27:42] <skunkworks> very nice
[20:27:56] <skunkworks> again - the holbrook conversion is a work of art
[20:28:06] <andypugh> The resolver is nice. It has a splined and screwed shaft, and came with all the crimps and mounting screws and the speciall splined tab-washer and nut. it’s clearly an aircraft part, and says “£1450 firm” on the super-rugged packaging.
[20:28:50] <andypugh> Looking round the web, £1450 was actually quite cheap.
[20:28:57] <andypugh> I paid £20…
[20:31:58] <skunkworks> have you threaded with it yet?
[20:41:28] <andypugh> Not yet, in fact that resolver isn’t even wired in yet. I got it all mounted this evening and called it a night.
[20:41:59] <andypugh> And, err, looking at the time, I should have gone to bed then, not now..
[20:43:22] <skunkworks> night!