Back
[00:19:39] <eric_unterhausen> usually have to sudo make install
[06:21:22] <memleak> might be a dumb question but did mhaberler's xenomai / preempt_rt hit master?
[06:39:51] <memleak> nevermind i dont see it
[06:59:32] <skunkworks> logger[mah],
[06:59:32] <logger[mah]> skunkworks: Log stored at
http://linuxcnc.mah.priv.at/irc/%23linuxcnc-devel/2014-01-02.html
[07:02:31] <skunkworks> I don't see anything out of the ordinary
[07:02:32] <skunkworks> http://pastebin.ca/2522230
[07:02:51] <skunkworks> compared to peters..
http://pastebin.ca/2521565
[07:08:09] <skunkworks> I am assuming freeby.mesaflash.com/mesaflash3.zip is not the correct url
[07:08:15] <skunkworks> but freeby.mesanet.com/mesaflash3.zip
[07:08:19] <skunkworks> doesn't work either
[07:12:16] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Dewey Garrett 05master fac208a 06linuxcnc 10lib/python/pyngcgui.py pyngcgui: show value not default value * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=fac208a
[08:05:30] <skunkworks> pcw_home, The mesaflash utility shows 0x00000001 when linuxcnc is not running
[08:05:31] <skunkworks> when running - and I have a long enough timeout.. I get a glimps of 0x00000000
[08:05:42] <skunkworks> but the second the timeout expires it goes back to 0x00000001
[08:38:29] <pcw_home> I fixed the mesaflash3.zip link
[08:39:59] <skunkworks> ok - did you see - it seems to show correctly. But something is tripping it or it isn't getting read correclty...
[08:40:12] <skunkworks> in linuxcnc
[08:41:34] <skunkworks> (and this card worked with rtnet - so I don't think it is the card..)
[08:48:50] <pcw_home> So how does the hm2 driver get 0xFFFFFF00 out of 0x00000000 0r 0x00000001?
[08:50:46] <pcw_home> since the 7I80 is sending the right data?
[08:50:46] <pcw_home> some kind of bad include library (maybe the same one that breaks the preemt_rt latency test)
[08:54:51] <pcw_home> skunkworks: do you have a link to micges patched etherhm2.c (with the read/write data included in the log)?
[08:54:55] <pcw_home> I can try it here and see what data is returned in the same section
[09:00:32] <skunkworks_> http://pastebin.ca/2520971
[09:00:39] <skunkworks_> pcw_home, I think that is it.
[09:07:07] <pcw_home> Thanks
[09:35:46] <pcw_home> Jan 2 07:12:21 pcw-G41M-Combo msgd:0: hal_lib:29023:rt hm2/hm2_7i76e.0: registered
[09:35:46] <pcw_home> Jan 2 07:12:21 pcw-G41M-Combo msgd:0: hal_lib:29023:rt board 7I76E-16 registred succesfully
[09:35:46] <pcw_home> Jan 2 07:12:21 pcw-G41M-Combo msgd:0: hal_lib:29023:rt hm2_eth: read() : PACKET SENDED [CMD:8142 | ADDR: 0D00 | SIZE: 4]
[09:35:46] <pcw_home> Jan 2 07:12:21 pcw-G41M-Combo msgd:0: hal_lib:29023:rt hm2_eth: read() : PACKET READED [DATA:00000000 | SIZE: 4]
[09:35:47] <pcw_home> Jan 2 07:12:21 pcw-G41M-Combo msgd:0: hal_lib:29023:rt hm2_eth: write(): PACKET SENDED [CMD:81C2 | ADDR: 0C00 | SIZE: 4]
[09:35:49] <pcw_home> Jan 2 07:12:21 pcw-G41M-Combo msgd:0: hal_lib:29023:rt hm2_eth: write(): PACKET SENDED [CMD:81C2 | ADDR: 0D00 | SIZE: 4]
[09:36:03] <pcw_home> so my data looks as expected
[09:36:19] * archivist loves the sended and readed
[09:37:01] <pcw_home> well it probably sounds right in Polish
[09:41:30] <skunkworks_> so - when I read back I get FFFFFF00
[09:45:12] <skunkworks_> is that data in another register or something?
[09:47:22] <skunkworks_> http://pastebin.ca/2520973?srch=empire+sended
[09:47:42] <skunkworks_> It reads it right initally...
[09:48:10] <skunkworks_> Jan 1 17:14:37 empire-OptiPlex-380 msgd:0: hal_lib:9536:rt board 7I80HD-16 registred succesfully
[09:48:10] <skunkworks_> Jan 1 17:14:37 empire-OptiPlex-380 msgd:0: hal_lib:9536:rt hm2_eth: read() : PACKET SENDED [CMD:8142 | ADDR: 0D00 | SIZE: 4]
[09:48:10] <skunkworks_> Jan 1 17:14:37 empire-OptiPlex-380 msgd:0: hal_lib:9536:rt hm2_eth: read() : PACKET READED [DATA:00000000 | SIZE: 4]
[10:06:41] <pcw_home> Dont know (or see how anding 0xFFFFFF00 and 1 is true)
[10:06:41] <pcw_home> look like something just gets broken there
[10:06:48] <pcw_home> looks
[10:08:41] <pcw_home> if you ever read 0xFFFFFF00 deom 0x0d00 via mesaflash I would suspect the 7I80
[10:08:44] <pcw_home> but this looks more like data corruption in the driver or something similar
[10:08:52] <pcw_home> s/deom/from/
[11:10:54] <skunkworks_> could you hook up to my card over the internet? ;)
[11:16:34] <pcw_home> Yes
[11:17:19] <skunkworks_> with linuxcnc?
[11:17:42] <pcw_home> well at 5 Hz maybe
[11:17:50] <skunkworks_> heh
[11:18:30] <skunkworks_> I don't know what steps I did different... I looked at the configure output and nothing jumped out/
[11:18:32] <pcw_home> hm2_eth doesn't deal with packet loss gracefully yet either
[11:21:29] <pcw_home> it looks like the driver has gone funny somehow
[11:21:33] <skunkworks_> Is your install updated?
[11:22:04] <pcw_home> updated?
[11:22:41] <skunkworks_> I installed from the 12.04.3 cd and then did all the updates it found before I installed the kernel/linuxcnc
[11:24:07] <skunkworks_> (did not isntall any closed source drivers)
[11:24:11] <pcw_home> I wonder if i can make a CF image or something so we are an the exact same page
[11:25:17] <pcw_home> Both systems I have have been through a checkered past so maybe I should do a stock 12.03 and run that script
[11:26:04] <pcw_home> one was Ubuntu server/xenomai/rt-preemt
[11:26:05] <pcw_home> the other was updated from 8.04
[11:26:11] <skunkworks_> wow
[11:26:24] <skunkworks_> could you do that?
[11:26:47] <pcw_home> yeah, took a while...
[11:27:37] <skunkworks_> it would be an interesting test. But I wonnder what andy and micges used
[11:28:01] <pcw_home> dont know
[11:28:13] <skunkworks_> are there rtpreemt kernels for 10.04?
[11:30:04] <pcw_home> I should have said I updated from 10.04 not 8.04
[11:30:36] <pcw_home> the 10.04 started as a liveCD
[11:31:03] <alex_joni> howdy y'all
[11:31:26] <pcw_home> I'm also curious about the latency-test bug under preemt_rt that seems suspicious
[11:31:42] <pcw_home> Hi alex_joni
[12:15:42] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Norbert Schechner 05master 448493a 06linuxcnc 10share/gscreen/skins/gmoccapy/gmoccapy_handler.py 10share/gscreen/skins/gmoccapy/release_notes.txt gmoccapy_0_9_9_7_4 - error starting GUI without preferences file * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=448493a
[14:13:09] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Norbert Schechner 05master 6ee9fb4 06linuxcnc 10(5 files in 3 dirs) gmoccapy_0_9_9_7_5 - deleted gscreen statusbar * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=6ee9fb4
[14:13:09] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Norbert Schechner 05master 9edbd19 06linuxcnc 10share/gscreen/skins/gmoccapy/gmoccapy_handler.py gmoccapy_0_9_9_7_5 - forgot to delete one debug error * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=9edbd19
[15:11:53] <skunkworks_> pcw_home, did a fresh install of 12.04.1 (something I had here) and installed and build rtpreempt/linuxcnc - nogo
[15:12:07] <skunkworks_> (didn't update anything)
[15:18:15] <skunkworks_> bbl
[16:02:38] <skunkworks> logger[mah]:
[16:02:38] <logger[mah]> skunkworks: Log stored at
http://linuxcnc.mah.priv.at/irc/%23linuxcnc-devel/2014-01-02.html
[16:38:57] <mhaberler> logger[mah]:
[16:38:57] <logger[mah]> mhaberler: Log stored at
http://linuxcnc.mah.priv.at/irc/%23linuxcnc-devel/2014-01-02.html
[18:11:37] <skunkworks> pcw_home: I think your going to have to do a fresh install - keep track of everything you install.
[18:12:00] <skunkworks> because I don't know what is going on. (As usual)
[18:37:10] <dgarr> cradek: any objections or comments for this touchy mod:
http://www.panix.com/~dgarrett/stuff/0001-touchy-allow-alternate-gladefile.patch
[21:45:07] <skunkworks> or if you could put something like a clonezilla image up somewhere... :)