Back
[09:55:10] <cradek> seb_kuzminsky: mine booted, but the screen blinks on and off, which the original kernel didn't (but neither one of them has correct video/resolution)
[09:56:01] <cradek> I fear a setup that doesn't use initrd, because surely at least dkms is broken
[09:58:40] <cradek> if I check the "make my MP3s work" checkbutton in the xubuntu installer, it gives me that nvidia driver
[10:00:26] <skunkworks> Really? is that the 'install 3rd party softare' check box?
[10:00:35] <skunkworks> I don't know if I have had that happen.
[10:01:34] <cradek> I don't remember exactly what it said - something about allowing closed source with unknown weird licenses in order to get your MP3s to work
[10:02:26] <cradek> can't find a picture of it
[10:02:51] <cradek> http://static.howtoforge.com/images/perfect_desktop_xubuntu_12.04/3.jpg
[10:03:06] <cradek> ah you're right, it does say third-party
[10:03:13] <cradek> the MP3 thing is right below it
[10:03:21] <skunkworks> right
[10:03:40] <skunkworks> I think I have almsot always checked that.
[10:04:10] <cradek> my particular machine worked slightly better without it (but video was still wrong and I never did fix it)
[10:04:24] <cradek> without the checkbox I got 1280x1024 and with it I got 640x480, both are wrong
[10:05:23] <cradek> the bootup screen (where they show you a graphic instead of the console messages) has not worked on either machine I tried (one is quite modern) - it just displays a few lines of blue crap that aren't synced
[10:05:57] <cradek> ubuntu just seems more and more broken to me
[10:09:04] <cradek> debian 7 is nice
[10:35:21] <seb_kuzminsky> i have other friends who prefer debian over ubuntu, and some who prefer mint over ubuntu
[10:35:54] <mozmck> I just installed mint and it is nice.
[10:37:53] <mozmck> I want to stay a little more up-to-date on some programs than debian stable, but debian testing can tend to change *too* much - at least it used to.
[10:39:03] <mozmck> Anyone tried SolydXK? debian (testing I think) based but they just give you monthly "update packs". Looks interesting.
[10:39:12] <cradek> mint is a fine successor to gnome2 but I have encountered several problems with it due to clueless packaging and/or renaming
[10:39:31] <cradek> they are fighting to get it in debian and debian is telling them to clean up their packages, so I bet it will improve
[10:40:45] <mozmck> Maybe you mean MATE as a successor to gnome2?
[10:40:57] <cradek> yes mint+MATE
[10:41:01] <mozmck> I'm using Cinnamon desktop and like it pretty well.
[10:41:19] <cradek> I meant they (the mint people?) are trying to get MATE into debian
[10:41:30] <cradek> I haven't tried that one
[10:41:33] <mozmck> haven't tried MATE, but I like XFCE pretty well.
[10:41:47] <jepler> fwiw I've set up XFCE as the desktop on my last 3 systems
[10:42:04] <cradek> I think my weapon of choice is xfce now, because although it doesn't quite have the features of gnome2, it has some years on it and seems free of terrible ideas
[10:42:26] <mozmck> Cinnamon is mostly a little slicker looking than XFCE, but there are some nice features of the file manager that I like better than in xfce.
[10:42:54] <cradek> I totally don't care about slick looks
[10:43:22] <mozmck> yes, xfce is good. I noticed the newest version also has a search bar in the main menu, which I've found to be pretty handy in cinnamon.
[10:43:22] <cradek> I want rectangular windows with functional decorations
[10:44:30] <cradek> the default xubuntu desktop theme had one-pixel window corners that you have to grab to resize. that's unusable.
[10:44:36] <mozmck> I don't mind it looking better, but it's the functionality I'm interested in - along with the ability to change things easily.
[10:46:24] <cradek> anymore I just try to choose the distribution and desktop that's had the least harm done to it so far - and that makes me sad
[10:47:38] <mozmck> yes. I may try solydxk (XFCE version) for my next install. I really don't care if it won't run on someones cell phone - or smart watch.
[10:48:02] <memleak> gnome 2 still the default in gentoo :)
[10:48:52] <mozmck> :) I really like debian based systems, but gentoo and arch do look interesting.
[10:49:27] <memleak> i used to be an archlinux dev, i had to stop using it because it was too unstable.
[10:49:32] <mozmck> I don't want to have to spend lots of time on the system though, because I don't have that time. I need something I can be done with and using in a few hours.
[10:49:44] <jepler> mozmck: agree
[10:49:47] <mozmck> interesting. that's what I want to avoid.
[10:49:50] <memleak> as soon as a new version of anything comes out, they package it, regardless of stability.
[10:50:13] <memleak> the day gcc 4.8 comes out is the day arch makes it the default.
[10:50:13] <cradek> I had never really used basic debian before, but was surprised recently to find that it was a fine and usable system with no harm done to it
[10:51:14] <mozmck> I started with debian in about '98, and ran testing because stable was too behind (like didn't support my hardware and other things).
[10:52:56] <memleak> arch is simply too new. if you dont constantly update it, you'll either be stuck with a broken system and hundreds of package conflicts that would take hours to repair, or you'd get lucky and find a time to update and get lucky enough which will last you awhile, but the package manager wont know what to do because it hasnt been updated in a few weeks.
[10:53:39] <mozmck> Switched to ubuntu because it worked better out of the box (at the time) than debian, and was updated reasonably often while still being stable. That has changed over the last couple years now, and I'm probably on my last ubuntu now.
[10:54:07] <memleak> arch is more of a war between the world's lastest linux utilities and libraries with absolutely no concept of anything else except version numbers
[10:54:51] <cradek> ubuntu 6-8-10 were all really good systems. it's going off the rails now.
[10:54:53] <memleak> gentoo is the most stable distribution out there, at least for me
[10:55:00] <mozmck> memleak: that's kind of the problem I had with debian unstable and testing, but probably not nearly as bad.
[10:55:20] <jepler> I've been using debian testing on my laptop and it hasn't bitten me too hard yet
[10:55:30] <jepler> servers get stable. linuxcnc would get stable.
[10:55:55] <mozmck> ubuntu 10 was good, 9 was not! a number of things that had worked in 8 quit in 9, and got a little better in 10.
[10:56:09] <cradek> I've only ever used the LTSes
[10:56:53] <mozmck> jepler: I didn't have too much trouble with testing. I think I had a couple of times X wouldn't start after an update, and there would be some package conflicts, but that has been a while back now.
[10:56:53] <memleak> the only bugs i hear about with debian unstable is how in the past 10 years something kept crashing 3 times
[10:57:12] <mozmck> yes, it was not bad.
[10:57:37] <memleak> im always like.. THREE TIMES? NO WAI!
[10:59:08] <mozmck> I had more than that. I would tell my wife that I had updated again, and she would always ask "now the computer won't boot?", or "what's broken now?"
[10:59:51] <mozmck> But it was not too bad. Not a single re-install but just incremental updates for about 10 years
[10:59:59] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Jeff Epler 05dgarr/testSHARE 019df68 06linuxcnc 10src/emc/usr_intf/axis/extensions/emcmodule.cc add PREFIX and SHARE to Python linuxcnc module * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=019df68
[10:59:59] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Dewey Garrett 05dgarr/testSHARE 5746b73 06linuxcnc 10lib/python/gremlin_view.py 10lib/python/pyngcgui.py lib/python: take advantage of linuxcnc.SHARE * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=5746b73
[11:00:57] <dgarr> do i need to do anything else to get a deb built (for precise) for this test branch?
[11:01:30] <cradek> nope, it'll build all of them
[11:01:43] <dgarr> great -- thanks cradek and jepler
[11:02:10] <cradek> I think it'll end up here:
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/dists/precise/scratch-rt/binary-i386/
[11:03:47] <cradek> oops
[11:04:23] <cradek> linuxcnc-build: watch deb-precise-rt-binary-i386
[11:04:27] <linuxcnc-build> there are no builds currently running
[11:05:03] <cradek> linuxcnc-build: sorry I keep doing that to you
[11:05:42] <jepler> I think I encountered a problem using "/" in branch names, because it's a forbidden character in package version numbers
[11:05:55] <jepler> if buildbot eventually complains then push again with a branch name like dgarr-testSHARE instead
[11:06:03] * jepler is not sure he has the details right
[11:06:07] <cradek> jepler: see
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/dists/precise/scratch-rt/binary-i386/
[11:06:17] <cradek> maybe he fixed it
[11:06:43] <jepler> that's good news
[11:08:03] <cradek> linuxcnc-build: watch checkin
[11:08:04] <linuxcnc-build> watching build checkin #1541 until it finishes [1h36m26s]..
[11:08:20] <cradek> guess you can't watch the ones that haven't started ye
[11:08:21] <cradek> t
[11:30:26] <seb_kuzminsky> all branch names should build debs fine
[11:31:38] <cradek> yay
[11:36:13] <seb_kuzminsky> look at how scripts/get-version-from-git transforms the branch name: it replaces everything but the allowed characters with "-"
[11:36:42] <seb_kuzminsky> for watching a builder that hasnt started, you can use notify
[11:36:46] <seb_kuzminsky> linuxcnc-build: help notify
[11:36:47] <linuxcnc-build> Usage: notify on|off|list [<EVENT>] ... - Notify me about build events. event should be one or more of: 'started', 'finished', 'failure', 'success', 'exception' or 'xToY' (where x and Y are one of success, warnings, failure, exception, but Y is capitalized)
[11:38:14] <cradek> seb_kuzminsky: every time I asked linuxcnc-build for something that was more than a few lines long (like status) it got kicked for excess flood. is there a throttle you can turn on?
[11:38:25] <cradek> ah, thanks
[11:46:02] <skunkworks> 'Fixed parabolic velocity comparison using law of cosines' '
[11:46:09] <skunkworks> what does that even mean?? ;)
[11:52:07] <cradek> I know what parabolas are, and I know what the law of cosines is
[11:52:13] <cradek> I know what velocity is
[11:57:37] <seb_kuzminsky> 'fixed' usually means something unusual in programming though ;-)
[12:01:45] <cradek> linuxcnc-build: notify on finished deb-precise-rt-binary-i386
[12:01:45] <linuxcnc-build> try 'notify on|off <EVENT>'
[12:02:34] <linuxcnc-build> build #1536 of hardy-i386-realtime-rip is complete: Warnings [8warnings compile] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/hardy-i386-realtime-rip/builds/1536 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[12:02:57] <skunkworks> https://github.com/robEllenberg/linuxcnc-mirror/compare/circular-blend-arc-alpha
[12:03:10] <skunkworks> :) last commit
[12:05:41] <linuxcnc-build> build #9 of package-rt-precise-source is complete: Warnings [8warnings shell] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/package-rt-precise-source/builds/9 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[12:05:52] <linuxcnc-build> build #418 of package-xenomai-precise-source is complete: Success [3build successful configuring debian] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/package-xenomai-precise-source/builds/418
[12:07:46] <linuxcnc-build> build #418 of package-rtpreempt-precise-source is complete: Success [3build successful configuring debian] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/package-rtpreempt-precise-source/builds/418
[12:09:32] <linuxcnc-build> build #1187 of package-rt-lucid-source is complete: Warnings [8warnings shell] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/package-rt-lucid-source/builds/1187 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[12:09:33] <linuxcnc-build> build #1186 of package-sim-precise-source is complete: Warnings [8warnings shell] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/package-sim-precise-source/builds/1186 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[12:14:20] <linuxcnc-build> build #1186 of package-sim-lucid-source is complete: Warnings [8warnings shell] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/package-sim-lucid-source/builds/1186 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[12:16:45] <linuxcnc-build> build #1188 of package-rt-hardy-source is complete: Warnings [8warnings shell] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/package-rt-hardy-source/builds/1188 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[12:19:37] <linuxcnc-build> build #1185 of package-sim-hardy-source is complete: Warnings [8warnings shell] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/package-sim-hardy-source/builds/1185 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[12:25:21] <linuxcnc-build> build #1197 of docs is complete: Warnings [8warnings compile] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/docs/builds/1197 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[12:25:25] <linuxcnc-build> build #1541 of checkin is complete: Success [3build successful] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/checkin/builds/1541
[12:26:59] <cradek> linuxcnc-build: watch deb-precise-rt-binary-i386
[12:26:59] <linuxcnc-build> watching build deb-precise-rt-binary-i386 #9 until it finishes..
[12:45:06] <linuxcnc-build> build #1174 of deb-lucid-sim-binary-i386 is complete: Warnings [8warnings shell_3 shell_4] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/deb-lucid-sim-binary-i386/builds/1174 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[12:48:58] <linuxcnc-build> build #1180 of deb-precise-sim-binary-i386 is complete: Warnings [8warnings shell_3 shell_4] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/deb-precise-sim-binary-i386/builds/1180 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[12:49:27] <seb_kuzminsky> hi andypugh
[12:49:35] <andypugh> Hi
[12:51:26] <linuxcnc-build> build #1179 of deb-precise-sim-binary-amd64 is complete: Warnings [8warnings shell_3 shell_4] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/deb-precise-sim-binary-amd64/builds/1179 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[12:52:18] <linuxcnc-build> build #9 of deb-precise-rt-binary-i386 is complete: Warnings [8warnings shell_3 shell_4] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/deb-precise-rt-binary-i386/builds/9 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[13:03:03] <linuxcnc-build> build #1177 of deb-hardy-sim-binary-amd64 is complete: Warnings [8warnings shell_3 shell_4] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/deb-hardy-sim-binary-amd64/builds/1177 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[13:05:26] <linuxcnc-build> build #1176 of deb-hardy-sim-binary-i386 is complete: Warnings [8warnings shell_3 shell_4] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/deb-hardy-sim-binary-i386/builds/1176 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[13:05:33] <linuxcnc-build> build #1179 of deb-hardy-rt-binary-i386 is complete: Warnings [8warnings shell_3 shell_4] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/deb-hardy-rt-binary-i386/builds/1179 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[13:10:17] <linuxcnc-build> build #1174 of deb-lucid-sim-binary-amd64 is complete: Warnings [8warnings shell_3 shell_4] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/deb-lucid-sim-binary-amd64/builds/1174 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[13:11:55] <linuxcnc-build> build #1175 of deb-lucid-rt-binary-i386 is complete: Warnings [8warnings shell_3 shell_4] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/deb-lucid-rt-binary-i386/builds/1175 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[13:17:41] <kwallace2> Gedit doesn't highlight .ngc files very well for me. The sample on the wiki page looks nice but the .lang file there doesn't produce the same effect on my setup. Does anyone know off-hand what might be wrong?
[13:21:57] <andypugh> There is a much better .lang file at cnc-club.ru
http://cnc-club.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=80&p=27169
[13:32:52] <kwallace2> andypugh: Thank you.
[13:33:43] <andypugh> I think the problem is that the underlying format for .lang files changed at some point. (though this is at bese a vague recollection)
[13:35:01] <kwallace2> I guess the wiki page is broken :(
[13:42:20] <cradek> wiki is working for me
[13:53:06] <cradek> dgarr: did you see your debs are done in
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/dists/precise/scratch-rt/binary-i386/
[13:55:55] <dgarr> yes -- the change i made worked as wanted with the deb (thanks jepler), now i would like to add the two commits to master and delete dgarr/testSHARE
[13:56:28] <dgarr> assistance/guidance appreciated
[13:56:47] <kwallace2> cradek: Sorry, I meant the Gedit wiki page is out of date and the .lang file there doesn't work anymore. I looks like MAH did some work on a .lang file but it looks like it's part of the document system, maybe.
[13:58:50] <cradek> dgarr: ok, just merge it: git checkout master; git merge dgarr/testSHARE
[13:59:27] <dgarr> done
[13:59:41] <dgarr> then push i suppose (after dry-run) ?
[13:59:57] <cradek> yep
[14:02:52] <dgarr> git push --dry-run origin master --> 68b13e1..5746b73 master -> master
[14:03:42] <cradek> you might try: gitk 68b13e1..5746b73
[14:03:57] <cradek> you should see your couple of commits and your merge
[14:04:33] <cradek> if so, take off the --dry-run
[14:05:41] <dgarr> ok -the 68b13e1 indicates the last commit, not one of the new commits ?
[14:06:29] <cradek> yes it's saying master moves from 68.. to 57..
[14:06:55] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Dewey Garrett 05master 5746b73 06linuxcnc fast forward * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=5746b73
[14:07:03] <dgarr> thanks for the help
[14:09:32] <dgarr> now how do i remove the dgarr/testSHARE branch from git.linuxcnc.org?
[14:12:52] <cradek> git push origin :dgarr/testSHARE
[14:13:19] <cradek> the format is <src>:<dst> and you can push an empty src (by specifying nothing) to delete
[14:13:38] <cradek> a fact that is hidden well in man git-push
[14:14:45] <linuxcnc-build> build #621 of precise-amd64-xenomai-rip is complete: Success [3build successful configure-debian-control] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/precise-amd64-xenomai-rip/builds/621
[14:14:49] <linuxcnc-build> build #637 of precise-x86-rtpreempt-rip is complete: Success [3build successful configure-debian-control] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/precise-x86-rtpreempt-rip/builds/637
[14:15:37] <KGB-linuxcnc> 05dgarr/testSHARE 5746b73 06linuxcnc 04. branch deleted * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=5746b73
[14:15:53] <dgarr> thanks again
[14:16:02] <cradek> you can also delete it locally if you want, with git branch -d
[14:17:12] <linuxcnc-build> build #621 of precise-amd64-rtpreempt-rip is complete: Success [3build successful configure-debian-control] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/precise-amd64-rtpreempt-rip/builds/621
[14:17:38] <dgarr> i know about that one, now i want to add those commits from dgarr/testSHARE to dgarr/config-cleanup ?
[14:18:01] <cradek> you could just merge master into dgarr/testSHARE
[14:18:07] <cradek> err
[14:18:12] <cradek> you could just merge master into dgarr/config-cleanup
[14:18:19] <cradek> git checkout dgarr/config-cleanup; git merge master
[14:18:45] <dgarr> i'll try that a little later and report
[14:19:00] <linuxcnc-build> build #647 of precise-x86-xenomai-rip is complete: Success [3build successful configure-debian-control] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/precise-x86-xenomai-rip/builds/647
[14:32:45] <linuxcnc-build> build #1537 of lucid-rtai-i386-clang is complete: Warnings [8warnings compile] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/lucid-rtai-i386-clang/builds/1537 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[14:38:02] <linuxcnc-build> build #1336 of precise-amd64-sim-clang is complete: Warnings [8warnings compile] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/precise-amd64-sim-clang/builds/1336 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[14:45:18] <linuxcnc-build> build #1539 of precise-i386-sim is complete: Warnings [8warnings compile] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/precise-i386-sim/builds/1539 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[14:48:05] <linuxcnc-build> build #1541 of precise-amd64-sim is complete: Warnings [8warnings compile] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/precise-amd64-sim/builds/1541 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[14:49:45] <linuxcnc-build> build #742 of precise-i386-realtime-rip is complete: Warnings [8warnings compile] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/precise-i386-realtime-rip/builds/742 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[14:51:25] <linuxcnc-build> build #1540 of lucid-amd64-sim is complete: Warnings [8warnings compile] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/lucid-amd64-sim/builds/1540 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[14:51:54] <linuxcnc-build> build #1538 of lucid-i386-sim is complete: Warnings [8warnings compile] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/lucid-i386-sim/builds/1538 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[14:54:34] <linuxcnc-build> build #1541 of lucid-i386-realtime-rip is complete: Warnings [8warnings compile] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/lucid-i386-realtime-rip/builds/1541 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[15:06:41] <linuxcnc-build> build #1542 of hardy-amd64-sim is complete: Warnings [8warnings compile] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/hardy-amd64-sim/builds/1542 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[15:07:42] <linuxcnc-build> build #1537 of hardy-i386-realtime-rip is complete: Warnings [8warnings compile] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/hardy-i386-realtime-rip/builds/1537 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[15:08:42] <linuxcnc-build> build #1540 of hardy-i386-sim is complete: Warnings [8warnings compile] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/hardy-i386-sim/builds/1540 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[15:11:58] <linuxcnc-build> build #10 of package-rt-precise-source is complete: Warnings [8warnings shell] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/package-rt-precise-source/builds/10 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[15:12:38] <linuxcnc-build> build #419 of package-xenomai-precise-source is complete: Success [3build successful configuring debian] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/package-xenomai-precise-source/builds/419
[15:13:56] <linuxcnc-build> build #419 of package-rtpreempt-precise-source is complete: Success [3build successful configuring debian] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/package-rtpreempt-precise-source/builds/419
[15:15:30] <linuxcnc-build> build #1187 of package-sim-precise-source is complete: Warnings [8warnings shell] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/package-sim-precise-source/builds/1187 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[15:15:46] <linuxcnc-build> build #1188 of package-rt-lucid-source is complete: Warnings [8warnings shell] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/package-rt-lucid-source/builds/1188 blamelist: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>
[15:17:25] <seb_kuzminsky> linuxcnc-build: notify list
[15:17:25] <linuxcnc-build> The following events are being notified: ['failure', 'finished']
[15:17:30] <seb_kuzminsky> linuxcnc-build: notify off finished
[15:17:30] <linuxcnc-build> The following events are being notified: ['failure']
[15:17:33] <seb_kuzminsky> hush now
[15:20:38] <cradek> oh he does that forever?
[15:23:04] <seb_kuzminsky> notify is like watch forever
[18:23:56] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Dewey Garrett 05dgarr/config-cleanup 3d20f7e 06linuxcnc 03configs/maintainer.txt 10tcl/bin/pickconfig.tcl pickconfig: begin flat user configs * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=3d20f7e
[18:23:57] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Dewey Garrett 05dgarr/config-cleanup 7106aba 06linuxcnc 10(38 files in 13 dirs) rearrange: remap configs: use nc_files/remap_lib * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=7106aba
[18:23:57] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Dewey Garrett 05dgarr/config-cleanup fd98985 06linuxcnc 10configs/sim/axis/halui_pyvcp/halui.ini 03configs/sim/nc_files rearrange: halui_pyvcp conform to flat user configs * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=fd98985
[18:23:59] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Dewey Garrett 05dgarr/config-cleanup ca8416e 06linuxcnc 10(9 files) rearrange: python_demo conform flat user configs * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=ca8416e
[18:24:03] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Dewey Garrett 05dgarr/config-cleanup e278cdc 06linuxcnc 10(10 files in 2 dirs) rearrange: gmoccapy conform flat user configs * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=e278cdc
[18:24:07] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Dewey Garrett 05dgarr/config-cleanup 7ccb61d 06linuxcnc 10tcl/bin/pickconfig.tcl pickconfig: support exclude list * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=7ccb61d
[18:24:11] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Dewey Garrett 05dgarr/config-cleanup 4e2038d 06linuxcnc Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into dgarr/config-cleanup * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=4e2038d
[18:24:14] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Dewey Garrett 05dgarr/config-cleanup 59778cf 06linuxcnc 10(137 files in 57 dirs) rearrange: conform ini files for flat user dir * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=59778cf
[18:24:18] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Dewey Garrett 05dgarr/config-cleanup fbce4a7 06linuxcnc 10configs/sim/axis/remap/cycle/tool.tbl 10configs/sim/axis/remap/extend-builtins/tool.tbl 03configs/sim/low_graphics/sim.tbl rearrange: fix some missing tool tbls * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=fbce4a7
[20:06:39] <linuxcnc-build> build #1176 of deb-lucid-sim-binary-i386 is complete: Failure [4failed shell_3] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/deb-lucid-sim-binary-i386/builds/1176 blamelist: Norbert Schechner <nieson@web.de>, Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>, Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>
[20:09:49] <linuxcnc-build> build #1182 of deb-precise-sim-binary-i386 is complete: Failure [4failed shell_3] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/deb-precise-sim-binary-i386/builds/1182 blamelist: Norbert Schechner <nieson@web.de>, Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>, Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>
[20:12:55] <linuxcnc-build> build #1181 of deb-precise-sim-binary-amd64 is complete: Failure [4failed shell_3] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/deb-precise-sim-binary-amd64/builds/1181 blamelist: Norbert Schechner <nieson@web.de>, Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>, Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>
[20:13:32] <linuxcnc-build> build #11 of deb-precise-rt-binary-i386 is complete: Failure [4failed shell_3] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/deb-precise-rt-binary-i386/builds/11 blamelist: Norbert Schechner <nieson@web.de>, Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>, Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>
[20:22:30] <linuxcnc-build> build #1179 of deb-hardy-sim-binary-amd64 is complete: Failure [4failed shell_3] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/deb-hardy-sim-binary-amd64/builds/1179 blamelist: Norbert Schechner <nieson@web.de>, Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>, Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>
[20:25:44] <linuxcnc-build> build #1181 of deb-hardy-rt-binary-i386 is complete: Failure [4failed shell_3] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/deb-hardy-rt-binary-i386/builds/1181 blamelist: Norbert Schechner <nieson@web.de>, Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>, Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>
[20:26:10] <linuxcnc-build> build #1178 of deb-hardy-sim-binary-i386 is complete: Failure [4failed shell_3] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/deb-hardy-sim-binary-i386/builds/1178 blamelist: Norbert Schechner <nieson@web.de>, Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>, Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>
[20:32:34] <linuxcnc-build> build #1177 of deb-lucid-rt-binary-i386 is complete: Failure [4failed shell_3] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/deb-lucid-rt-binary-i386/builds/1177 blamelist: Norbert Schechner <nieson@web.de>, Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>, Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>
[20:32:35] <linuxcnc-build> build #1176 of deb-lucid-sim-binary-amd64 is complete: Failure [4failed shell_3] Build details are at
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/deb-lucid-sim-binary-amd64/builds/1176 blamelist: Norbert Schechner <nieson@web.de>, Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@highlab.com>, Dewey Garrett <dgarrett@panix.com>, Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>
[20:34:28] <dgarr> ? dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 2
[20:59:08] <seb_kuzminsky> dgarr: the important part of the error message is:
[20:59:10] <seb_kuzminsky> Files exist in debian/tmp, but should not:
[20:59:10] <seb_kuzminsky> debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/linuxcnc/examples/sample-configs/maintainer.txt
[21:00:14] <seb_kuzminsky> that means a new file is installed, but not mentioned in debian/linuxcnc.files.in, which tells the debian packaging system what files to *expect*
[21:00:25] <seb_kuzminsky> so add it to debian/linuxcnc.files.in
[21:04:44] <dgarr> so: i added the file: configs/maintainer.txt, and the new line for linuxcnc.in should be: usr/share/doc/linuxcnc/examples/sample-configs/maintainer.txt
[21:04:46] <dgarr> ?
[21:36:20] <seb_kuzminsky> sounds right
[21:36:52] <dgarr> thanks, i 'll try that
[21:36:55] <seb_kuzminsky> you can try building the debian package on your own machine by running 'fakeroot debian/rules binary'
[21:37:05] <seb_kuzminsky> if it works, push it
[21:37:22] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Dewey Garrett 05dgarr/config-cleanup 6e2226a 06linuxcnc 10debian/linuxcnc.files.in rearrange: add maintainer.txt to linuxcnc.files.in * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=6e2226a
[21:37:32] <seb_kuzminsky> or just push it ;-)
[21:38:26] <dgarr> i dont have all the packages to make docs
