#linuxcnc-devel Logs

Jul 25 2024

02:26 AM -!- #linuxcnc-devel mode set to +v by ChanServ
03:34 AM pere: andypugh_: look like 2.9 now switched to a debhelper complaining about man pages left behind in debian/tmp/. I guess commit ccb92536958a6998f69f3e4372084a713b9df930 in master need to go into 2.9 too.
03:34 AM pere: specificly the linuxcnc.install.in part.
03:34 AM pere: I believe it will solve the CI failure in <URL: https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pull/3041 >.
04:36 AM Tom_itx is now known as Tom_L
04:44 AM -!- #linuxcnc-devel mode set to +v by ChanServ
04:53 AM -!- #linuxcnc-devel mode set to +v by ChanServ
04:53 AM rmu: isn't it a bit much happening in the maintenance-branch (2.9)?
06:54 AM andypugh_: rmu: It’s things that Debian is complaining about, that are causing problems with us gettting a released version into Debian.
07:07 AM pere: there is movement in the po4a issue. the developer is on vacation, but aware of the issue and asked for more info.
02:26 PM pere: ah, a fix for the latex problem in debian unstable was just uploaded. :)
02:28 PM pere: <URL: https://github.com/debian-tex/texlive-nonbin/commit/10ca97f5b388d381ccda51dbf1f3de0dd12a12d3 > is the fix.
03:19 PM Unterhaus_ is now known as unterhausen
04:39 PM pere: andypugh_: <URL: https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pull/3042 > should fix 2.9 github CI failures.
04:39 PM pere: I did not drop unstable/sid build, as that bug is on its way into unstable right now.
05:29 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#2687](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/7/builds/2687) of `10-rip.debian-11-bullseye-rtpreempt-amd64` 8completed with warnings.
05:49 PM andypugh_: pere: It doesn’t seem to have done, or not completely
05:49 PM andypugh_: Looks like a whole new issue. The following packages have unmet dependencies:
05:49 PM andypugh_: libgsl27 : Depends: libgslcblas0 (= 2.7.1+dfsg-6+b1) but it is not going to be installed
05:49 PM pere: andypugh_: its just the latex fix in unstable not having propagated to all mirrors.
05:50 PM andypugh_: OK, so I should merge it?
05:51 PM pere: I believe it is good to go, yes. if you are in doubt, you can rerun the bookworm indep build
06:12 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#2811](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/13/builds/2811) of `00-checkin` 3completed successfully.
07:11 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1773](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/2/builds/1773) of `50-deb-uspace.debian-12-bookworm-amd64` 8completed with warnings.
07:16 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#2083](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/23/builds/2083) of `50-deb-uspace.debian-11-bullseye-amd64` 8completed with warnings.
08:55 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1774](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/2/builds/1774) of `50-deb-uspace.debian-12-bookworm-amd64` 4failed.
09:00 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#2084](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/23/builds/2084) of `50-deb-uspace.debian-11-bullseye-amd64` 4failed.
10:54 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1775](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/2/builds/1775) of `50-deb-uspace.debian-12-bookworm-amd64` 8completed with warnings.
10:59 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#2085](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/23/builds/2085) of `50-deb-uspace.debian-11-bullseye-amd64` 8completed with warnings.
11:26 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#2690](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/7/builds/2690) of `10-rip.debian-11-bullseye-rtpreempt-amd64` 4failed.
11:53 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#2814](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/13/builds/2814) of `00-checkin` 4failed.