#linuxcnc-devel Logs

Oct 10 2023

02:32 AM rigid: andypugh: it's what's passing in CI. When it's fixed, it can be changed to the correct value (0 probably)
03:03 AM rigid: hm, shouldn't the "get SetWait" command actually be "get WaitMode" ?
03:04 AM rigid: it seems similar to "get timeout" returning "SET_TIMEOUT 0" instead of "TIMEOUT 0".
03:19 AM rigid: btw, -1 as default to select "all of the above" is a pattern in linuxcncrsh. so having it different for spindles doesn't seem right.
03:20 AM rigid: how does linuxcnc behave in other parts with axes? also first-by-default?
03:21 AM rigid: or joints?
10:39 AM rigid: is there a random element in homing simulated joints? i'd expect "set home 0 ; get joint_homed" to always output "YES" for joint 0 if set_wait = done. I'm getting random results
11:49 AM linuxcnc-build: build #3510 of 1660.rip-buster-python3 is complete: Failure [4failed compile runtests] Build details are at http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/1660.rip-buster-python3/builds/3510 blamelist: Rene Hopf <renehopf@mac.com>
11:57 AM linuxcnc-build: build #3912 of 1640.rip-buster-rtpreempt-amd64 is complete: Failure [4failed compile runtests] Build details are at http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/1640.rip-buster-rtpreempt-amd64/builds/3912 blamelist: Rene Hopf <renehopf@mac.com>
12:16 PM linuxcnc-build: build #10330 of 0000.checkin is complete: Failure [4failed] Build details are at http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/0000.checkin/builds/10330 blamelist: Rene Hopf <renehopf@mac.com>
12:26 PM andypugh: rigid: I don’t think that there is anything that you do on all joints at the same time, except homing. And that has a sequence set in the INI file.
12:36 PM rigid: andypugh: you mean for -1 being the default? there are a few commands affected, joint_type, joint_units etc.
12:37 PM rigid: those still got axis 0-6 hardcoded as default. i might fix that in the future.
12:38 PM rigid: andypugh: at the moment i'm more worried about "set home" returning immediately although the axis isn't homed, yet
12:38 PM rigid: is that a bug?
12:39 PM andypugh: Maybe not. You hve started the process. Maybe you are expected to poll get_homed or status to seee when it has finished.
12:40 PM rigid: if I understand correctly it should wait after the command is done, according to the docs "The set_wait setting controls the wait after receiving a command. It can be "received" (after the command was sent and received) or "done" (after the command was done)."
12:41 PM rigid: some commands do, some don't
12:41 PM rigid: polling would probably expected with "set_wait=received"
12:41 PM rigid: *be
12:54 PM linuxcnc-build: build #3511 of 1660.rip-buster-python3 is complete: Failure [4failed compile runtests] Build details are at http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/1660.rip-buster-python3/builds/3511 blamelist: Rene Hopf <renehopf@mac.com>
01:04 PM linuxcnc-build: build #3913 of 1640.rip-buster-rtpreempt-amd64 is complete: Failure [4failed compile runtests] Build details are at http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/1640.rip-buster-rtpreempt-amd64/builds/3913 blamelist: Rene Hopf <renehopf@mac.com>
01:22 PM linuxcnc-build: build #10331 of 0000.checkin is complete: Failure [4failed] Build details are at http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/0000.checkin/builds/10331 blamelist: Rene Hopf <renehopf@mac.com>
02:07 PM linuxcnc-build: build #3914 of 1640.rip-buster-rtpreempt-amd64 is complete: Failure [4failed compile runtests] Build details are at http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/1640.rip-buster-rtpreempt-amd64/builds/3914 blamelist: Rene Hopf <renehopf@mac.com>
02:27 PM linuxcnc-build: build #10332 of 0000.checkin is complete: Failure [4failed] Build details are at http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/0000.checkin/builds/10332 blamelist: Rene Hopf <renehopf@mac.com>
02:44 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1684](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/12/builds/1684) of `10-rip.debian-07-wheezy-amd64` 3completed successfully.
02:44 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1683](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/22/builds/1683) of `10-rip.debian-09-stretch-rtpreempt-i386` 3completed successfully.
02:44 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1685](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/19/builds/1685) of `10-rip.debian-08-jessie-i386` 3completed successfully.
02:44 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1681](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/10/builds/1681) of `10-rip.ubuntu-12-04-precise-rtai-i386` 3completed successfully.
02:56 PM Tom_L: wow 4 in a row
03:01 PM Roguish-shop: hey Tom _L what the external offsets used for?
03:01 PM Tom_L: in what context?
03:01 PM Tom_L: workpiece?
03:02 PM Tom_L: i'm not entirely sure on that one
03:02 PM Roguish-shop: well, i'm not sure. I'm looking at qtdragonHD, trying to run a simple sim of it, and it crashes with external offset errors
03:03 PM Roguish-shop: and I don't even know what they are....
03:03 PM Roguish-shop: silly me
03:03 PM Tom_L: i don't use the sims sorrry
03:03 PM Tom_L: could be a work offset?
03:03 PM Roguish-shop: http://linuxcnc.org/docs/devel/html/motion/external-offsets.html
03:04 PM Tom_L: looks like that would be if you're using world coordinates instead of G54..59 etc
03:05 PM Roguish-shop: just trying to see what the real difference is between qtdragon and qtdragonhd
03:05 PM Tom_L: never used qtdragon
03:05 PM Roguish-shop: ok,
03:05 PM Roguish-shop: I really don't like it when a simple sim example crashes on startup. ought to be checked before release.
03:09 PM Tom_L: sry i'm not much help today ;/
03:10 PM Roguish-shop: no problem....
03:10 PM Roguish-shop: i'll post something on the forum for morley
03:10 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1679](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/14/builds/1679) of `10-rip.debian-10-buster-rtpreempt-amd64` 8completed with warnings.
03:12 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1680](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/7/builds/1680) of `10-rip.debian-11-bullseye-rtpreempt-amd64` 8completed with warnings.
03:18 PM Tom_L: Roguish-shop, External-offsets are intended for use with small offsets that are applied within the soft-limit bounds.
03:18 PM Tom_L: maybe they are used in world coords to help align material?
03:18 PM Tom_L: similar as you would touch off X & Y in a fixture offset
03:19 PM Tom_L: it's not something i would ever use...
03:19 PM Roguish-shop: sounds redundant
03:20 PM Tom_L: a friend uses world coordinates on a small mill but not with lcnc
03:20 PM Tom_L: he just aligns the material 'close'
03:20 PM Tom_L: grbl
03:38 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1686](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/11/builds/1686) of `10-rip.debian-12-bookworm-rtpreempt-amd64` 8completed with warnings.
03:42 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1405](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/6/builds/1405) of `30-dsc-uspace.debian-11-bullseye` 8completed with warnings.
03:43 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1405](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/18/builds/1405) of `30-dsc-uspace.debian-10-buster` 8completed with warnings.
03:43 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1404](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/8/builds/1404) of `30-dsc-uspace.debian-12-bookworm` 8completed with warnings.
03:52 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1403](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/21/builds/1403) of `20-docs` 8completed with warnings.
03:52 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1755](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/13/builds/1755) of `00-checkin` 3completed successfully.
04:26 PM mozmck: I'm trying to build 2.9 debs here and getting an error /usr/bin/mandb: can't update index cache <...>/docs/man/76999: Invalid argument
04:27 PM mozmck: Then it says /usr/bin/mandb: can't create index cache <...>/docs/man/76999: Resource temporarily unavailable
04:28 PM mozmck: This happens on MX-23 (based on bookworm) and Mint-21.1 Is it possible this is due to a missing dependency?
04:48 PM seb_kuzminsky: mozmck: that doesn't sound like a missing dependency error
05:04 PM mozmck: hi seb! the error doesn't give much info it seems.
05:05 PM seb_kuzminsky: what does `ls -ls docs/man/76999` say? it's an unusual filename...
05:06 PM seb_kuzminsky: sorry, `ls -l`
05:06 PM seb_kuzminsky: hi mozmck :-)
05:06 PM mozmck: Let me see - I think it must be a temp file or something because the number at the end changes each time I run
05:08 PM rene-dev5: seb_kuzminsky could you fix the git tag issue we had?
05:13 PM mozmck: Yeah, there is no 76999.
05:29 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1681](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/7/builds/1681) of `10-rip.debian-11-bullseye-rtpreempt-amd64` 4failed.
05:29 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1680](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/14/builds/1680) of `10-rip.debian-10-buster-rtpreempt-amd64` 4failed.
05:31 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1756](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/13/builds/1756) of `00-checkin` 4failed.
05:32 PM seb_kuzminsky: rene-dev5: what is the git tag issue you had? (i've seen that you guys have been putting in a ton of work but i haven't followed it in detail)
05:35 PM seb_kuzminsky: the v2.9.1 tag looks correct, and is correctly signed
05:38 PM seb_kuzminsky: i don't see any build in the buildbot corresponding to the v2.9.1 tag
05:40 PM Unterhaus_ is now known as Unterhausen
05:45 PM seb_kuzminsky: linuxcnc-build: force build --branch=2.9 --revision=v2.9.1
05:45 PM linuxcnc-build: you must provide a Builder, try 'force build [--branch=BRANCH] [--revision=REVISION] [--props=PROP1=VAL1,PROP2=VAL2...] <WHICH> <REASON>'
05:45 PM seb_kuzminsky: linuxcnc-build: force build --branch=2.9 --revision=v2.9.1 0000.checkin
05:45 PM linuxcnc-build: build forced [ETA 6h27m17s]
05:45 PM linuxcnc-build: I'll give a shout when the build finishes
06:54 PM skunkworks: The K&T had 1 offset you set using thumb wheels..
06:54 PM skunkworks: I sure it was cutting edge in the 60'd
06:54 PM skunkworks: 60's
07:55 PM linuxcnc-build: Hey! build 0000.checkin #10333 is complete: Success [3build successful]
07:55 PM linuxcnc-build: Build details are at http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/0000.checkin/builds/10333
08:10 PM seb_kuzminsky: that built the 2.9.1 dsc: http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/release/dists/buster/2.9-rtpreempt/source/
08:10 PM seb_kuzminsky: it's working on the deb now
08:11 PM seb_kuzminsky: linuxcnc-build2: force build --branch=2.9 --revision=v2.9.1 00-checkin
08:11 PM linuxcnc-build2: Force build successfully requested.
08:38 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1681](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/14/builds/1681) of `10-rip.debian-10-buster-rtpreempt-amd64` 8completed with warnings.
08:40 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1682](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/7/builds/1682) of `10-rip.debian-11-bullseye-rtpreempt-amd64` 8completed with warnings.
08:54 PM linuxcnc-build: build #3024 of 4041.deb-buster-rtpreempt-amd64 is complete: Failure [4failed shell_3 shell_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/4041.deb-buster-rtpreempt-amd64/builds/3024
09:19 PM linuxcnc-build2: Build [#1757](http://buildbot2.highlab.com/buildbot/#builders/13/builds/1757) of `00-checkin` 3completed successfully.
09:31 PM linuxcnc-build: build #2915 of 4042.deb-buster-rtpreempt-rpi4 is complete: Failure [4failed shell_3 shell_4] Build details are at http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/builders/4042.deb-buster-rtpreempt-rpi4/builds/2915