#linuxcnc-devel | Logs for 2017-01-29

Back
[00:49:55] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Chris Morley 052.7 1f29c7c 06linuxcnc 10src/hal/classicladder/vars_access.c 10src/hal/classicladder/vars_names_list.c classicladder -fix whitespace errors * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=1f29c7c
[00:49:56] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03Chris Morley 052.7 e4aa855 06linuxcnc 10src/hal/classicladder/vars_access.c 10src/hal/classicladder/vars_names_list.c classicladder -fix sequential variable access * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=e4aa855
[18:14:44] <JT-Shop> pcw_home: is there any situations where the RTAI kernel is better?
[18:15:31] <pcw_home> parallel port step/dir systems mainly
[18:16:43] <pcw_home> Preempt-RT usually has somewhat worse latency especially on slower systems
[18:17:36] <JT-Shop> ok, thanks
[18:17:56] <pcw_home> disadvantages or RTAI:
[18:17:58] <pcw_home> 1. seems moribund (no recent kernels)
[18:17:59] <pcw_home> 2. much harder to debug drivers etc
[18:18:17] <pcw_home> s/or/of/
[20:06:51] <CaptHindsight> 3: RTAI official maintainer will only accept the work in your patches, he will not give you credit for them
[20:44:20] <seb_kuzminsky> bummer, the zero-divide feed/speed calculator went away :-(
[20:44:21] <seb_kuzminsky> http://zero-divide.net/?page=fswizard
[20:44:24] <seb_kuzminsky> i will miss it
[20:44:51] <seb_kuzminsky> what do you all use for feeds and speeds? hopefully something more transferrable than your wizardly intuition :-)
[21:52:50] <Tom_L> seb_kuzminsky you can still get it as a phone app or pc
[21:53:50] <Tom_L> i think i've got it on my phone
[21:55:48] <Tom_L> http://hsmadvisor.com/index.php?page=FSWizard_H
[21:58:18] <Tom_L> http://www.daycounter.com/Calculators/GCode/Feed-Rate-Calculator.phtml
[21:58:21] <Tom_L> http://www.custompartnet.com/calculator/milling-speed-and-feed
[21:58:29] <Tom_L> there are a couple others
[21:58:52] <Tom_L> http://www.onsrud.com/plusdocs/Doc/index.html?model.code=FeedSpeeds
[21:59:00] <Tom_L> and various chipload recomendations