Back
[06:27:07] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03John Thornton 052.7 0b227af 06linuxcnc 10docs/src/gcode/overview.txt Docs: markup fixes * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=0b227af
[06:27:07] <KGB-linuxcnc> 03John Thornton 052.7 4aaa6ab 06linuxcnc 10docs/src/common/linux-faq.txt Docs: dmesg is diagnostic messages not bootup * 14http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commitdiff;h=4aaa6ab
[06:36:21] <jthornton> I just noticed a post on the forum where the parallel port checker I made way back when had been added to LinuxCNC, when I ran Ox278 it crashed my computer when I ran Ox378 it did as expected
[10:12:37] <mozmck> I just posted my bug report on M67 becoming a queue buster. Let me know if it is not clear.
[11:00:02] <jepler> thanks
[12:11:22] <seb_kuzminsky> jthornton: i dont understand this change you just pushed:
[12:11:23] <seb_kuzminsky> -* Use an appropriate decimal precision
[12:11:24] <seb_kuzminsky> +.Use an appropriate decimal precision
[12:11:38] <seb_kuzminsky> is the new one better than the old in some way?
[12:16:38] <pcw_home> "See the Motion Section for more finformation."
[12:16:40] <pcw_home> mcodes m63..65
[12:48:05] <jepler> ".Foo whatever" is a "paragraph title", while "* Foo whatever" is a bullet
[12:48:48] <jepler> for whatever that's worth
[14:53:35] <skunksleep> mozmck: rob hopes to look at it tomorrow
[15:00:16] <pcw_home> new TP breakage?
[15:07:42] <jepler> it would be interesting to know whether it is new or existed in 2.6...
[16:26:06] <mozmck> skunksleep: great!
[16:26:30] <mozmck> jepler: I guess I could compile 2.6 and see...
[16:27:06] <mozmck> I should probably try other M-codes that are supposed to be synchronized with motion.
[16:29:12] <skunksleep> It mostly works.... ;)
[16:35:19] <mozmck> Yes :) Unfortunately, it is quite important for us to put an M67 code close to the end of a cut and it not cause a dip in velocity.
[16:53:52] <seb_kuzminsky> yay thanks rob for looking at it
[16:54:13] <seb_kuzminsky> as soon as that fix is in i'll release 2.7.1