Back
[07:49:18] <jepler> > Folks, seeing the words "designed to be safer, more consistent, and less error prone replacement" in a manpage does *NOT* mean "OK, quit reading it - no need to go further, not even to the end of the paragraph".
[08:26:59] <alex_joni> jepler: then maybe that needs to go to the end of the manpage
[09:48:39] <mozmck> hmm, debian jessie gives 2 kernel options on boot, but won't install if you select the 686-pae option :)
[09:49:25] <mozmck> this is the 32-bit image
[12:03:08] <seb_kuzminsky> skunksleep!
[12:03:19] <seb_kuzminsky> how's things?
[12:26:11] <skunksleep> seb_kuzminsky: water broke. (Got an epidermal so sleeping now)
[12:26:56] <seb_kuzminsky> sounds good
[12:27:03] <seb_kuzminsky> what does stella think of all this?
[12:29:01] <skunksleep> epidural
[12:30:44] <mozmck> oh! hope all goes well skunksleep.
[12:55:24] <PetefromTn_> Wow Congrats skunkie!
[13:09:50] <skunksleep> S
[13:09:58] <skunksleep> Thanks!
[15:47:17] <skunksleep> Sullivan Elwood 8lb7oz
[15:48:47] <micges> skunksleep: great, congrats!
[15:53:15] <Tom_itx> congrats skunksleep... now maybe in 18 yrs you can get some sleep
[15:59:41] <seb_kuzminsky> awesome :-)
[16:28:12] <jepler> skunksleep: congrats
[16:42:57] <seb_kuzminsky> i'm gonna release 2.7.0, unless someone tells me about a bug they want to fix first
[16:43:32] <Tom_itx> we'll tell you right after you release it
[16:43:50] <seb_kuzminsky> heh yeah
[16:44:10] <mozmck> skunksleep: congratulations!
[16:44:43] <mozmck> seb_kuzminsky: let's merge ja right quick first ;)
[16:45:34] <seb_kuzminsky> oh you
[16:46:20] <mozmck> I haven't really had a chance to really use it yet. So many other things get in the way.
[16:47:45] <seb_kuzminsky> maybe for 2.8
[16:48:57] <seb_kuzminsky> speaking of which, maybe somebody else wants to be release manager for 2.8?
[16:50:21] <micges> I did few retrofits on 2.7, didn't noticed nothing buggy
[16:51:08] <seb_kuzminsky> yeah, i have a couple of machines running 2.7 and it's really fine
[16:51:12] <micges> even ja6 branch works quite well
[16:52:35] <seb_kuzminsky> do you have any lathes running ja?
[16:52:53] <seb_kuzminsky> i have reports of bugs when there are non-consecutive axes (like lathes' XZ)
[16:53:24] <micges> seb_kuzminsky: hostmot2 dpll support for encoder should be added but I won't do this this week
[16:53:47] <micges> no no lathes so far
[16:54:00] <seb_kuzminsky> can you save it for 2.8 or do we need to hold up 2.7 for that?
[16:56:54] <micges> I think we should hold one more week, got two machines to setup so I'll check 2.7 again and we have long weekend this week so I'll add dpll stuff
[16:58:10] <seb_kuzminsky> alright cool
[17:22:37] <andypugh> That was confusing. It seems that %lld and %lli in kernel space print 1701669204 regardless of the s64 being passed.
[17:28:27] <jepler> that is an exceedingly odd result
[17:28:35] <jepler> via rtapi_print_msg ?
[17:29:17] <jepler> NAME
[17:29:17] <jepler> rtapi_snprintf, rtapi_vsnprintf - Perform snprintf-like string formatting
[17:29:25] <jepler> > In particular: formatting of long long values is not supported.
[17:30:17] <jepler> must be some terrible reason for that limitation
[17:31:06] <andypugh> Ah well :-)
[17:31:18] <andypugh> The number is baffling though.
[20:53:24] <cradek> jthornton: yuck, you've really got to do something about that
[20:58:03] <Tom_itx> turn off joins & parts and it won't looks so bad
[21:49:53] <jepler> (hm it would be pretty awesome if the irc client could show only the last part & join of a given nick by default)
[21:54:21] <cradek> hey that's a good idea
[22:02:49] <jepler> and then, 6 years later, you find that you've written your own custom programming language in which to implement your own irc client
[22:20:19] <Tom_itx> i turn them off on my logger or the logs would probably be 2x as big
[22:21:10] <Tom_itx> i leave them on on my client since i'm op in several channels